Ingleson v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 4, 2007·No. 06-2288·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2288

KATHRYN ANNE INGLESON,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A38-538-659)

Submitted: August 20, 2007 Decided: September 4, 2007

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Peter Drennan, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kathryn Anne Ingleson, a native and citizen of the United

Kingdom, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s order denying

relief from removal. We have reviewed the administrative record

and find no error in the Board’s finding that Ingleson is

ineligible for the relief sought. See 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(h)(3)

(2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ingleson, No. A38-538-659

(B.I.A. Nov. 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingleson v. Gonzales, (4th Cir. 2007).

Ingleson v. Gonzales (Ingleson v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related