Ingleson v. Gonzales
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2288
KATHRYN ANNE INGLESON,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A38-538-659)
Submitted: August 20, 2007 Decided: September 4, 2007
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Peter Drennan, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kathryn Anne Ingleson, a native and citizen of the United
Kingdom, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s order denying
relief from removal. We have reviewed the administrative record
and find no error in the Board’s finding that Ingleson is
ineligible for the relief sought. See 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(h)(3)
(2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ingleson, No. A38-538-659
(B.I.A. Nov. 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ingleson v. Gonzales (Ingleson v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.