Ingleson v. Gonzales

Fourth Circuit

Ingleson v. Gonzales

238 F. App'x 991

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 4, 2007·No. No. 06-2288·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kathryn Anne Ingleson, a native and citizen of the United Kingdom, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s order denying relief from removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no error in the Board’s finding that Ingleson is ineligible for the relief sought. See 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(h)(3) (2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ingleson, No. A38-538-659 (B.I.A. Nov. 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kathryn Anne Ingleson, a native and citizen of the United Kingdom, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s order denying relief from removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no error in the Board’s finding that Ingleson is ineligible for the relief sought. See 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(h)(3) (2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ingleson, No. A38-538-659 (B.I.A. Nov. 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Ingleson v. Gonzales, 238 F. App'x 991 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

238 F. App'x 991 (Ingleson v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related