Ingersoll v. TUESLEY

759 N.W.2d 393

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 27, 2009·No. 137568·Published

Opinion

759 N.W.2d 393 (2009)

John INGERSOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gordon TUESLEY, Linda Tuesley, Gertrude Henderson, Gerald Freed, Mary Freed, Laura Burrer, Judy Johnson, and Ron Hagerman, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 137568. COA No. 276828.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 27, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

759 N.W.2d 393 (2009)

John INGERSOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gordon TUESLEY, Linda Tuesley, Gertrude Henderson, Gerald Freed, Mary Freed, Laura Burrer, Judy Johnson, and Ron Hagerman, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 137568. COA No. 276828.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 27, 2009.

Order

Ingersoll v. TUESLEY, 759 N.W.2d 393 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

759 N.W.2d 393 (Ingersoll v. TUESLEY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

John INGERSOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon TUESLEY, Linda Tuesley, Gertrude Henderson, Gerald Freed, Mary Freed, Laura Burrer, Judy Johnson, and Ron Hagerman, Defendants-Appellees.

Order

John INGERSOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gordon TUESLEY, Linda Tuesley, Gertrude Henderson, Gerald Freed, Mary Freed, Laura Burrer, Judy Johnson, and Ron Hagerman, Defendants-Appellees.