Ingersoll v. TUESLEY

762 N.W.2d 506

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 23, 2009·No. 137568·Published

Opinion

762 N.W.2d 506 (2009)

John INGERSOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gordon TUESLEY, Linda Tuesley, Gertrude Henderson, Gerald Freed, Mary Freed, Laura Burrer, Judy Johnson, and Ron Hagerman, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 137568, COA No. 276828.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 23, 2009.

*507 Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's January 27, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

762 N.W.2d 506 (2009)

John INGERSOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gordon TUESLEY, Linda Tuesley, Gertrude Henderson, Gerald Freed, Mary Freed, Laura Burrer, Judy Johnson, and Ron Hagerman, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 137568, COA No. 276828.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 23, 2009.

*507 Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's January 27, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Ingersoll v. TUESLEY, 762 N.W.2d 506 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

762 N.W.2d 506 (Ingersoll v. TUESLEY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

John INGERSOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon TUESLEY, Linda Tuesley, Gertrude Henderson, Gerald Freed, Mary Freed, Laura Burrer, Judy Johnson, and Ron Hagerman, Defendants-Appellees.

*507 Order

John INGERSOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gordon TUESLEY, Linda Tuesley, Gertrude Henderson, Gerald Freed, Mary Freed, Laura Burrer, Judy Johnson, and Ron Hagerman, Defendants-Appellees.