Industrial Commission v. Wodinsky

198 N.E. 867, 130 Ohio St. 267, 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 267, 4 Ohio Op. 270, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 215
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1935
Docket25187
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 N.E. 867 (Industrial Commission v. Wodinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Industrial Commission v. Wodinsky, 198 N.E. 867, 130 Ohio St. 267, 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 267, 4 Ohio Op. 270, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 215 (Ohio 1935).

Opinion

On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that the transcript of the record of the Court of Appeals shows that there was filed in that court, on July 21, 1934, a petition in error, transcript and original papers from the Court of Common Pleas, and an examination of the transcript of the record of the Court of Common Pleas does not show on or before that date that a judgment was entered after the Court of Common Pleas overruled a motion for new trial. Therefore the Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction of a proceeding in error instituted in that court.

It appears that this omission from the transcript, or the failure to enter judgment after the motion for new trial was overruled, was not due to the nonfeasance of the clerk as was the fact in Columber v. City of Kenton, 111 Ohio St, 211, 145 N. E., 12, and that opinion cannot be relied upon by plaintiff in error in this case.

It is further ordered and adjudged that this cause be, and the same hereby is, remanded to the Court of *268 Appeals with directions to vacate the judgment entered in that court and dismiss the proceeding in error.

Petition in error dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Szymanski v. City of Toledo
246 N.E.2d 368 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 N.E. 867, 130 Ohio St. 267, 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 267, 4 Ohio Op. 270, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/industrial-commission-v-wodinsky-ohio-1935.