Indus PVR LLC v. MAA-Sharda, Inc.

140 A.D.3d 1668, 31 N.Y.S.3d 918
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 2016
DocketAppeal No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 140 A.D.3d 1668 (Indus PVR LLC v. MAA-Sharda, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Indus PVR LLC v. MAA-Sharda, Inc., 140 A.D.3d 1668, 31 N.Y.S.3d 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered December 26, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant MAA-Sharda, Inc. for leave to reargue and renew its opposition to plaintiff’s motion for a judgment of foreclosure and sale.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Indus PVR LLC v MAA-Sharda, Inc. ([appeal No. 1] 140 AD3d 1666 [2016]).

Present — Smith, J.P., Centra, DeJoseph, Curran and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

INDUS PVR LLC v. MAA-SHARDA, INC.
140 A.D.3d 1666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.3d 1668, 31 N.Y.S.3d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indus-pvr-llc-v-maa-sharda-inc-nyappdiv-2016.