Independence Construction Corp. v. AMOCO Construction Corp.

33 A.D.3d 963, 822 N.Y.S.2d 729
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 2006·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by Jon A. Lefkowitz and Stuart I. Davis from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated August 20, 2004, which, sua sponte, imposed sanctions upon them pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-2.1 (b).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order dated August 20, 2004 is not appealable as of right, as no appeal lies as of right from an order that does not decide a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]) and no application for leave to appeal was made (see CPLR 5701 [c]). In any event, the record is inadequate to determine the appeal on the merits (see Cuffie v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 260 AD2d 423 [1999]). Miller, J.E, Santucci, Goldstein, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Independence Construction Corp. v. AMOCO Construction Corp., 33 A.D.3d 963, 822 N.Y.S.2d 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

33 A.D.3d 963 (Independence Construction Corp. v. AMOCO Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. James
88 A.D.3d 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Krinsky v. Shouela
76 A.D.2d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Rabinovich v. Shevchenko
63 A.D.3d 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)