Cuffie v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cuffie v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

260 A.D.2d 423, 686 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 260 A.D.2d 423 (Cuffie v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuffie v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 260 A.D.2d 423, 686 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In [424]*424an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated February 2, 1998, which, upon the defendant’s oral application, dismissed the complaint for failure to timely serve a notice of claim.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from did not decide a motion made on notice and is therefore not appealable as of right (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Aievoli v Aievoli, 249 AD2d 253; Sherwood v Roper, 237 AD2d 275). No application has been made for permission to appeal, and we are not inclined to grant leave to appeal under the circumstances of this case, considering the sparseness of the record (see, Aievoli v Aievoli, supra; Matter of Hartman v Smith, 207 AD2d 345). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In [424]*424an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated February 2, 1998, which, upon the defendant’s oral application, dismissed the complaint for failure to timely serve a notice of claim.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from did not decide a motion made on notice and is therefore not appealable as of right (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Aievoli v Aievoli, 249 AD2d 253; Sherwood v Roper, 237 AD2d 275). No application has been made for permission to appeal, and we are not inclined to grant leave to appeal under the circumstances of this case, considering the sparseness of the record (see, Aievoli v Aievoli, supra; Matter of Hartman v Smith, 207 AD2d 345). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 423, 686 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuffie-v-new-york-city-health-hospitals-corp-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack