Ind. Refrig. and Equip. v. Commission
This text of 2 Or. Tax 122 (Ind. Refrig. and Equip. v. Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decision for plaintiff rendered March 5, 1965.
Modified
The plaintiff corporation is engaged in the business of selling, installing, manufacturing and assembling various kinds of refrigeration equipment.
1. The defendant upon the trial conceded that the plaintiff is "primarily" engaged in manufacturing and assembling if "primarily" means "substantially." It does. This court so decided in Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. Commission,
Defendant argues that "primarily" means over 50 percent. If the legislature had so intended it could have used that term or similar words denoting over half. Such words are not complicated or words of art. It did not. It stated that "primarily" engaged was sufficient.
Plaintiff is entitled to the personal property tax offset for the years 1958 to and including 1962. Costs to plaintiff.
"(2)(a) Each corporation subject to subsection (1) of this section which is primarily engaged in manufacturing, processing or assembling materials into finished products for purposes of sale is entitled to an offset against the tax imposed by subsection (1) of this section." *Page 124
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Or. Tax 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ind-refrig-and-equip-v-commission-ortc-1965.