In the Matter of Vew

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In the Matter of Vew

273 P.3d 334, 248 Or. App. 477

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 29, 2012

DocketPetition Number 01J100033 J100033 A149649

StatusPublished

This text of 273 P.3d 334 (In the Matter of Vew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Vew, 273 P.3d 334, 248 Or. App. 477 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

273 P.3d 334 (2012) 248 Or. App. 477

In the Matter of V.E.W., aka V.E.W., a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
O.W., Appellant.

Petition Number 01J100033; J100033; A149649.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted February 3, 2012. Decided February 29, 2012.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Shannon Flowers, Deputy Public Defender, Appellate Division, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Justice J. Rillera, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals a permanency judgment changing the case plan for her child from reunification to guardianship. She argues that the juvenile court erred in failing to make and include in the judgment the statutorily required findings. ORS 419B.476(5). The Department of Human Services concedes that the judgment is deficient and should be remanded in order for the juvenile court to comply with ORS 419B.476(5). See State ex rel. Juv. Dept. v. J.F.B., 230 Or.App. 106, 115, 214 P.3d 827 (2009) (remanding for juvenile court to enter judgments that comply *335 with ORS 419B.476). We agree with and accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

273 P.3d 334 (2012) 248 Or. App. 477

In the Matter of V.E.W., aka V.E.W., a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
O.W., Appellant.

Petition Number 01J100033; J100033; A149649.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted February 3, 2012. Decided February 29, 2012.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Shannon Flowers, Deputy Public Defender, Appellate Division, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Justice J. Rillera, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals a permanency judgment changing the case plan for her child from reunification to guardianship. She argues that the juvenile court erred in failing to make and include in the judgment the statutorily required findings. ORS 419B.476(5). The Department of Human Services concedes that the judgment is deficient and should be remanded in order for the juvenile court to comply with ORS 419B.476(5). See State ex rel. Juv. Dept. v. J.F.B., 230 Or.App. 106, 115, 214 P.3d 827 (2009) (remanding for juvenile court to enter judgments that comply *335 with ORS 419B.476). We agree with and accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 P.3d 334, 248 Or. App. 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-vew-orctapp-2012.

Opinion

In the Matter of V.E.W., aka V.E.W., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. O.W., Appellant.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Matter of V.E.W., aka V.E.W., a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
O.W., Appellant.