Department of Human Services v. O. W.

273 P.3d 334, 248 Or. App. 477, 2012 WL 762134, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 208
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 29, 2012
DocketJ100033; Petition Number 01J100033; A149649
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 P.3d 334 (Department of Human Services v. O. W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Human Services v. O. W., 273 P.3d 334, 248 Or. App. 477, 2012 WL 762134, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 208 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Mother appeals a permanency judgment changing the case plan for her child from reunification to guardianship. She argues that the juvenile court erred in failing to make and include in the judgment the statutorily required findings. ORS 419B.476(5). The Department of Human Services concedes that the judgment is deficient and should be remanded in order for the juvenile court to comply with ORS 419B.476(5). See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. J. F. B., 230 Or App 106, 115, 214 P3d 827 (2009) (remanding for juvenile court to enter judgments that comply with ORS 419B.476). We agree with and accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Vew
273 P.3d 334 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 P.3d 334, 248 Or. App. 477, 2012 WL 762134, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-human-services-v-o-w-orctapp-2012.