IN THE MATTER OF RONALD JOHN DOEVE (Three Cases)

303 Ga. 672
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 7, 2018
DocketS18Y0456, S18Y0457, S18Y0458
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 303 Ga. 672 (IN THE MATTER OF RONALD JOHN DOEVE (Three Cases)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
IN THE MATTER OF RONALD JOHN DOEVE (Three Cases), 303 Ga. 672 (Ga. 2018).

Opinion

303 Ga. 672 FINAL COPY

S18Y0456, S18Y0457, S18Y0458. IN THE MATTER OF RONALD JOHN DOEVE (three cases).

PER CURIAM.

These three matters are before the Court on the Report and

Recommendation of the Review Panel, recommending the disbarment of Ronald

John Doeve (State Bar No. 224735) for financial misconduct and

misrepresentations made in the Bar disciplinary proceedings. These matters

arose with the State Bar’s filing of three formal complaints, which were

considered together before the special master, the Honorable Robert J.

Castellani.

All three matters are related to Doeve’s representation of Vivify Holdings,

Inc. and Jason Herring, one of Vivify’s corporate officers. The facts, as found

by the special master and supported by the record, are as follows: In State

Disciplinary Board Docket (SDBD) No. 6851, Doeve agreed to act as escrow

agent for a $100,000 investment that an investor wished to make in Vivify. Doeve agreed not to disburse the funds without the investor’s approval.

However, Doeve disbursed the funds to Vivify the same day the funds were

wired to his trust account. Doeve failed to communicate with the investor to

confirm receipt of the funds or disbursement of the funds and failed to respond

to the investor’s inquiries and to provide an accounting.

In SDBD No. 6853, Doeve agreed to represent a former client in obtaining

funds owed by Herring. He also agreed to assist the former client’s husband, the

husband’s company, and the former client’s lawyer in obtaining funds owed by

Herring. Doeve and Herring falsely represented to these individuals that

Herring had $2,000,000 in available funds and that Herring had deposited

$460,000 into Doeve’s Chase Private Client account, which was not a trust

account; Doeve wrote checks totaling $460,000 to the former client and others

from the Chase account, but those checks were returned for insufficient funds.

Doeve failed to provide an accounting and provided misleading information

about the cause of the non-payment and when they could expect to be paid.

Doeve also provided misleading information regarding this matter in the Bar

disciplinary proceedings.

In SDBD No. 6854, Doeve agreed to assist Herring in paying legal fees

2 to a lawyer who had represented Herring’s girlfriend. An intermediary was

needed because the lawyer would not accept Herring’s check since Herring had

previously provided the lawyer with an insufficient funds check. Doeve misled

the lawyer about whether he had received funds from Herring, and although

Doeve later agreed to pay the lawyer $15,000, he wrote the lawyer an

insufficient funds check from an account that was not a trust account. Doeve

continued to mislead the lawyer about the cause for the returned check and when

he could expect to be paid.

The special master found that by these actions, Doeve violated Rules 1.15

(I) and (II), 1.15 (III) (b) (2), and 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia Rules of

Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum sanction for

a violation of each of these Rules is disbarment.

The special master found as aggravating factors that Doeve acted with a

selfish or dishonest motive; that he showed indifference to making restitution;

that he made false statements in the disciplinary process; that he had substantial

experience in the practice of law, having been admitted to the Bar in 1982; and

that the facts in the three matters showed a pattern of misconduct. The special

master recommended disbarment as the appropriate sanction.

3 After Doeve filed exceptions to the special master’s report and sought

review by the Review Panel, he filed a petition for voluntary discipline and an

amended petition, in which he admitted violating Rules 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II), and

1.15 (III) (b) (2) and sought to “tender his license.”1 The Review Panel did not

address the newly filed petitions for voluntary discipline, but adopted the special

master’s report and likewise recommended disbarment.

In this Court, Doeve filed exceptions to the Review Panel’s report.

However, Doeve’s exceptions do not challenge the crux of the allegations

against him, and, in fact, he has submitted to this Court a petition for voluntary

discipline, admitting violations of Rules 1.15 (I) and (II) and Rule 1.15 (III) (b)

(2).

Having reviewed the record, and in light of Doeve’s admissions of serious

violations of the rules governing financial matters and trust accounts, we agree

that disbarment is the appropriate sanction. See In the Matter of Axam, 297 Ga.

786 (778 SE2d 222) (2015) (accepting petition for voluntary surrender of

1 The petition did not cite either Rule 4-110 (f) (petition for voluntary surrender of license is tantamount to disbarment) or Rule 1-208 (a) (1) (petition for leave to resign Bar membership shall contain statement that there are no disciplinary actions pending). 4 license where attorney received $100,000; did not place it in, or administer it

from, his trust account; and disbursed the funds according to his client’s

instructions rather than the instructions of the owner of the funds); In the Matter

of Harris, 301 Ga. 378 (801 SE2d 39) (2017) (disbarring lawyer who issued

insufficient funds checks from trust account and commingled personal funds

with trust account funds); In the Matter of Choi, 297 Ga. 793 (778 SE2d 228)

(2015) (accepting voluntary surrender of license where attorney failed to

properly manage substantial funds entrusted to him in a fiduciary capacity).

Therefore, it is hereby ordered that the name of Ronald John Doeve be

removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of

Georgia. Doeve is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Disbarred. All the Justices concur.

5 Decided May 7, 2018.

Disbarment.

Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman,

Wolanda R. Shelton, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of

Georgia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 Ga. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-ronald-john-doeve-three-cases-ga-2018.