in the Matter of R. L.
Opinion
R.L.'s appointed counsel on appeal filed a brief asserting that the appeal is frivolous. The brief complies with the requirements for such briefs discussed in In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296 (Tex. 1998); and more generally, in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel states that he has diligently examined the record and researched the law applicable to the facts and issues in the case. Counsel's brief contains a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no meritorious errors to be advanced. A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to R.L. and to his guardian, and they were advised of their right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. A pro se brief was not filed. We have independently reviewed the record and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.
We grant counsel's motion to withdraw from the case and affirm the juvenile court's order modifying the probation judgment of delinquency and the court's order modifying the probation disposition to a disposition of commitment to the Texas Youth Commission.
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, Patterson, and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed: April 11, 2002
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Matter of R. L. (in the Matter of R. L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.