In the Matter of O.G.R., a Juvenile

Court of Appeals of Texas

In the Matter of O.G.R., a Juvenile

511 S.W.3d 81, 2014 WL 2538139, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6081

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 4, 2014

Docket08-13-00173-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 511 S.W.3d 81 (In the Matter of O.G.R., a Juvenile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of O.G.R., a Juvenile, 511 S.W.3d 81, 2014 WL 2538139, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6081 (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice.

O.G.R., a juvenile, appeals from an order committing him to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department. The juvenile court entered an adjudication order finding O.G.R. engaged in delinquent conduct by committing the offense of burglary of a habitation and placed him on juvenile probation. The State subsequently filed a motion to modify disposition alleging O.G.R. had violated the terms and conditions of the probation order. Following a hearing, the juvenile court found that the O.G.R. had violated the probation order and entered an order committing him to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by advancing one contention which counsel says might arguably support the appeal. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1974). The procedures established in Anders apply to juvenile appeals. In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 297 (Tex.1998); In re A.R.B., 225 S.W.3d 131, 132 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2005, no pet.).

A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to O.G.R., and he has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice.

O.G.R., a juvenile, appeals from an order committing him to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department. The juvenile court entered an adjudication order finding O.G.R. engaged in delinquent conduct by committing the offense of burglary of a habitation and placed him on juvenile probation. The State subsequently filed a motion to modify disposition alleging O.G.R. had violated the terms and conditions of the probation order. Following a hearing, the juvenile court found that the O.G.R. had violated the probation order and entered an order committing him to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by advancing one contention which counsel says might arguably support the appeal. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1974). The procedures established in Anders apply to juvenile appeals. In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 297 (Tex.1998); In re A.R.B., 225 S.W.3d 131, 132 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2005, no pet.).

A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to O.G.R., and he has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 S.W.3d 81, 2014 WL 2538139, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-ogr-a-juvenile-texapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack