In the Matter of Natalie Dawn Mays
This text of 303 Ga. 152 (In the Matter of Natalie Dawn Mays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
303 Ga. 152 FINAL COPY
S18Y0315. IN THE MATTER OF NATALIE DAWN MAYS.
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary matter is before the Court on a Notice of Discipline
seeking the disbarment of Natalie Dawn Mays (State Bar No. 479761). Mays
failed to acknowledge service of the Notice of Discipline mailed to her at the
post office box address on file with the State Bar’s membership department.
The State Bar then properly served Mays by publication pursuant to Bar Rule
4-203.1 (b) (3) (ii), but she failed to file a Notice of Rejection. Therefore, she
is in default, has waived her right to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to
such discipline and further proceedings as may be determined by this Court. See
Bar Rule 4-208.1 (b).
The facts, as deemed admitted by Mays’s default, are as follows. In
August 2013, a client retained Mays to represent her in connection with a
bankruptcy case and paid Mays $4,000. The client thereafter tried to contact
Mays on numerous occasions about her case, but Mays failed to respond. Mays also failed to respond to the client’s attorney in a pending personal injury
lawsuit in order to settle that lawsuit and to the bankruptcy trustee. In April
2017, the bankruptcy court entered orders sanctioning Mays and terminating her
as counsel for the client. Mays did not refund the unearned portion of the fee
that the client had paid.
The client filed a grievance with the State Bar, and a Notice of
Investigation was issued. Although Mays was served by publication pursuant
to Bar Rule 4-203.1 (b) (3) (ii), she failed to file a sworn, written response as
required by Bar Rule 4-204.3. Mays is currently under an indefinite suspension
for her failure to adequately respond to the State Bar’s investigation of this
matter. See In the Matter of Mays, S17Y1976 (July 27, 2017).
The Investigative Panel found that by this conduct Mays violated Georgia
Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.16, and 3.2. See Bar Rule 4-102
(d). The maximum sanction for a violation of Rule 1.3 is disbarment. The
maximum sanction for a violation of the other rules is a public reprimand.
In aggravation of discipline, the Investigative Panel found that Mays acted
wilfully in collecting a fee from the client and then abandoning her legal matter;
acted with a selfish motive; has substantial experience in the practice of law,
2 having been admitted to the bar in 1994; has a prior disciplinary history, having
received an Investigative Panel reprimand on October 3, 2008; and failed to
respond adequately to the Notice of Investigation.
Having reviewed the record, we conclude that disbarment is the
appropriate sanction in this matter. See In the Matter of Archer, 292 Ga. 553,
554 (739 SE2d 386) (2013); In the Matter of Shaw, 292 Ga. 149, 150 (734 SE2d
405) (2012). Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the name of Natalie Dawn
Mays be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the
State of Georgia. Mays is reminded of her duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219
(c).
Disbarred. All the Justices concur.
3 Decided February 19, 2018.
Disbarment.
Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Andreea N. Morrison,
Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
303 Ga. 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-natalie-dawn-mays-ga-2018.