In the Matter of Jonnie Mae Graham
This text of 306 Ga. 380 (In the Matter of Jonnie Mae Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
306 Ga. 380 FINAL COPY
S19Y0706. IN THE MATTER OF JOHNNIE MAE GRAHAM.
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary matter is before the Court on a Notice of
Discipline seeking the disbarment of Johnnie Mae Graham (State
Bar No. 304625). Graham failed to acknowledge service of the
Notice of Discipline mailed to her at the post office box address on
file with the State Bar’s membership department. The State Bar
then properly served Graham by publication pursuant to Bar Rule
4-203.1 (b) (3) (ii), but she failed to file a Notice of Rejection. Thus,
she is in default, has waived her right to an evidentiary hearing, and
is subject to such discipline and further proceedings as may be
determined by this Court. See Bar Rule 4-208.1 (b).
The facts, as deemed admitted by virtue of Graham’s default,
are as follows. In 2013, a client retained Graham to represent him
in connection with a car accident, and Graham filed a lawsuit on the
client’s behalf in December 2013. However, after the lawsuit was filed, Graham failed to respond to the client, who attempted to
contact her on numerous occasions regarding the lawsuit. In August
2015, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the client’s case.
Graham did not file a response to the motion to dismiss, and in
October 2015 the court dismissed the client’s case due to Graham’s
failure to appear at a hearing. The State Disciplinary Board found
that Graham failed to perform work on the client’s behalf,
abandoned the legal matter the client entrusted to her to the client’s
detriment, failed to return the client’s file, and failed to provide
information requested by the State Bar during the investigation of
this disciplinary matter.
Based on these facts, the State Disciplinary Board found
probable cause to believe that Graham violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.16
(d), and 3.2 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found in
Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum sanction for a violation of Rule
1.3 is disbarment, while the maximum sanction for a violation of
Rules 1.4, 1.16, and 3.2 is a public reprimand. In aggravation of the level of discipline in this case, see Bar
Rule 4-208.2 (a) (4), the State Disciplinary Board found that Graham
has extensive experience in the practice of law, having been
admitted to the Bar in 1981, and that she has previous disciplinary
history, having received a Review Panel reprimand in 2013. See In
the Matter of Graham, 292 Ga. 901 (742 SE2d 735) (2013).
Having reviewed the record, we conclude that disbarment is
the appropriate sanction in this matter. See, e.g., In the Matter of
Mays, 303 Ga. 152 (810 SE2d 478) (2018); In the Matter of Miller,
302 Ga. 366 (806 SE2d 596) (2017). Accordingly, it is ordered that
the name of Johnnie Mae Graham be removed from the rolls of
persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Graham
is reminded of her duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (b).
All the Justices concur. Decided June 3, 2019 – Reconsideration denied July 1, 2019.
Disbarment.
Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, William D.
NeSmith III, Deputy General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K.
Mittelman, Andreea N. Morrison, Assistant General Counsel State
Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
306 Ga. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-jonnie-mae-graham-ga-2019.