In the Matter of Marriage of Gorger and Gorger
This text of 728 P.2d 104 (In the Matter of Marriage of Gorger and Gorger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the matter of the Marriage of Kathy Marie GORGER Now Known As Kathy Marie Corley, Respondent, and
James Leonard Gorger, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Robert Norman Ehmann, Pendleton, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
No appearance for respondent.
Before WARDEN, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DEITS, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Husband appeals from an order adjudging him in contempt for willful failure to pay child support. He contends that the trial court failed to advise him of the right to appointed counsel.
*105 ORS 33.095 requires the court to inform an alleged contemnor, if unrepresented by counsel, of both the right to counsel and the right to appointed counsel, if the alleged contemnor is indigent and if incarceration may result. Husband appeared for the hearing without counsel. The court did not advise him of his right to appointed counsel. Therefore, we reverse and remand. State ex rel Ketcham v. Ketcham, 68 Or. App. 740, 683 P.2d 555 (1984).
Because we are remanding, husband's other assignments of error need not be addressed.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
728 P.2d 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-marriage-of-gorger-and-gorger-orctapp-1986.