In re the Marriage of Gorger

728 P.2d 104, 82 Or. App. 417
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 12, 1986·No. 81-10-1223; CA A36709·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Husband appeals from an order adjudging him in contempt for willful failure to pay child support. He contends that the trial court failed to advise him of the right to appointed counsel.

ORS 33.095 requires the court to inform an alleged contemnor, if unrepresented by counsel, of both the right to counsel and the right to appointed counsel, if the alleged contemnor is indigent and if incarceration may result. Husband appeared for the hearing without counsel. The court did not advise him of his right to appointed counsel. Therefore, we reverse and remand. State ex rel Ketcham v. Ketcham, 68 Or App 740, 683 P2d 555 (1984).

Because we are remanding, husband’s other assignments of error need not be addressed.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Marriage of Gorger, 728 P.2d 104, 82 Or. App. 417 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

728 P.2d 104 (In re the Marriage of Gorger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mead v. Batchlor
460 N.W.2d 493 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1990)
State ex rel. Van Eck v. Van Eck
767 P.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)
In the Matter of Marriage of Gorger and Gorger
728 P.2d 104 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)