In the Matter of Livingston

674 S.E.2d 878, 285 Ga. 173, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 753, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 86
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 9, 2009
DocketS09Y0281
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 674 S.E.2d 878 (In the Matter of Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Livingston, 674 S.E.2d 878, 285 Ga. 173, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 753, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 86 (Ga. 2009).

Opinions

Per curiam.

In this disciplinary matter Christine M. Livingston failed to file a Notice of Rejection to the Notice of Discipline, after being properly served under Bar Rule 4-203.1 (b) (3) (i), of the Georgia Rules of [174]*174Professional Conduct. Therefore, Livingston is in default, has waived her rights to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to such discipline and further proceedings as may be determined by this Court. See Bar Rule 4-208.1 (b).

Decided March 9, 2009. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

The admitted facts show that Livingston was the closing attorney representing a mortgage company in a 2005 residential real estate closing; that she failed to file the deed filings necessary to complete the closing; that she abandoned the legal matter the mortgage company entrusted to her without cause, and to her client’s detriment; and she was served by publication with a Notice of Investigation in this matter, but did not respond, which the Investigative Panel considered an aggravating factor.

Based on these admitted facts, Livingston has violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 9.3, all of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.4 and 9.3 is a public reprimand and the maximum sanction for a violation of Rule 1.3 is disbarment.

Having reviewed the record we agree that a one-year suspension is the appropriate sanction in this case. It is hereby ordered that the name of Christine M. Livingston be suspended from the practice of law in the State of Georgia for one year from the date of this order. Livingston is reminded of her duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

One-year suspension.

All the Justices concur, except Sears, C. J., Hunstein, P. J., and Thompson, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Jones
716 S.E.2d 222 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2011)
In the Matter of Livingston
674 S.E.2d 878 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 S.E.2d 878, 285 Ga. 173, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 753, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-livingston-ga-2009.