In the Matter of Lesley Annis
This text of 306 Ga. 187 (In the Matter of Lesley Annis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
306 Ga. 187 FINAL COPY
S19Y0792. IN THE MATTER OF LESLEY ANNIS.
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary matter is before the Court on a Notice of
Discipline seeking the disbarment of Lesley Annis (State Bar No.
019780) for several rules violations related to her abandonment of
two clients. The State Bar attempted to serve Annis personally at
the address she listed with the State Bar’s Membership
Department, but the State Bar investigator executed an entry of
service non est inventus. The State Bar then properly served Annis
by publication pursuant to Bar Rule 4-203.1 (b) (3) (ii), but she failed
to file a Notice of Rejection. Therefore, she is in default, has waived
her right to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to such discipline
and further proceedings as may be determined by this Court. See
Bar Rule 4-208.1 (b).
The facts, as deemed admitted by virtue of Annis’s default, are
as follows. In 2015, Annis agreed to represent a client in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy action in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Georgia. One of the client’s creditors filed a
motion for relief from the stay, and the motion came before the
bankruptcy court on two occasions. The client and counsel for the
creditor appeared at both hearings, but Annis did not. The
bankruptcy court then scheduled a hearing to consider whether
Annis was in contempt of court, but Annis failed to appear at that
hearing as well. Accordingly, the bankruptcy court found that Annis
had abandoned her client and barred Annis from further practice in
the bankruptcy court until she addressed her failure to appear at
the hearing as ordered in the client’s case.
In 2016, Annis agreed to represent another client in a Chapter
13 bankruptcy action in the Northern District of Georgia, and the
client paid Annis $5,000 in legal fees. However, the client was
unable to reach Annis after January 17, 2017 to discuss his case,
despite the fact that he called, sent texts and e-mails, and visited
her office. The client then notified the bankruptcy court that he was
unable to reach his lawyer. In addition, the client sent Annis
2 termination letters in May 2017, but Annis failed to respond, and
the bankruptcy court terminated Annis as the client’s counsel of
record by order in June 2017. Although Annis was served with a
Notice of Investigation by publication related to this disciplinary
matter, she failed to submit a sworn response as required by Bar
Rule 4-204.3.
The Disciplinary Board found as to both matters that, by her
actions, Annis willfully abandoned the legal matters entrusted to
her, to her clients’ detriment; failed to abide by the clients’ decisions
concerning the scope and objectives of representation; failed to
communicate with the clients and to keep them reasonably informed
about the status of their bankruptcy cases; and charged the clients
an unreasonable fee, as she took a fee to file both Chapter 13
bankruptcy cases, but did not complete either one. Accordingly, the
Disciplinary Board found probable cause to believe that Annis
violated Rules 1.2 (a), 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, and 9.3 of the Georgia Rules of
Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum
sanction for a violation of Rules 1.2 and 1.3 is disbarment, and the
3 maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.4, 1.5, and 9.3 is a
public reprimand.
In aggravation for the level of discipline, see Bar Rule 4-208.2
(a) (4), the Disciplinary Board found that Annis acted dishonestly in
collecting fees and abandoning her clients’ cases; failed to respond
to the Notice of Investigation in this matter (resulting in her current
interim suspension); violated multiple rules of professional conduct;
and had substantial experience in the practice of law, having been
admitted to the State Bar in 2000.
Having reviewed the record, we conclude that disbarment is
the appropriate sanction in this matter. Accordingly, it is hereby
ordered that the name of Lesley Annis be removed from the rolls of
persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Annis is
reminded of her duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (b).
Disbarred. All the Justices concur.
4 Decided June 10, 2019.
Disbarment.
Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, William D.
NeSmith III, Deputy General Counsel State Bar , Jenny K.
Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of
Georgia.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
306 Ga. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-lesley-annis-ga-2019.