In the Matter of Kelly

59 N.Y. 595, 1875 N.Y. LEXIS 300
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 26, 1875·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

This was an application to disbar the respondent, made by Henry H. Morange, who was also the attorney and counselor of the court. The only point presented is, that the court below had no power to order the disbursements in addition to ten dollars costs, upon denying the application, to be paid by the applicant; and the Code, section 315, is claimed to be applicable and controlling. We think the court had power to make the order appealed from, by virtue of its authority over the conduct of its attorneys and officers, independent of the provisions of the Code. The proceeding is of a public nature and quasi criminal, and when instituted by an attorney in bad faith, as was found by the General Term, it was competent for that court to provide indemnity to the aggrieved party by imposing the burden upon the accuser.

The manner of exercising the power is not reviewable.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed. *Page 597

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Kelly, 59 N.Y. 595, 1875 N.Y. LEXIS 300 (N.Y. 1875).

59 N.Y. 595 (In the Matter of Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Spencer
137 A.D. 330 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
In re Watt & Dohan
154 F. 678 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1907)
State ex rel. Kehoe v. McRae
49 Fla. 389 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1905)
State ex rel. Fowler v. Finley
30 Fla. 325 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1892)
In the Matter of an Attorney
83 N.Y. 164 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)