In re Watt & Dohan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

In re Watt & Dohan

149 F. 1009, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4923

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 8, 1907

DocketNo. 34

StatusPublished

This text of 149 F. 1009 (In re Watt & Dohan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Watt & Dohan, 149 F. 1009, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4923 (circtedpa 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

I heartily approve of the action of the Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in suspending indefinitely the respondents from, practice before that court. The brief which they filed was scandalous and insulting, and richly deserved the punishment that was inflicted; but I have serious doubts whether the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennyslvania, to which they have been admitted to practice, ought to punish them again for this single fault, aggravated though it was. It is quite clear that, while this example of their professional delinquency was aggravated, it falls short of criminal conduct, and I think, therefore, -hnt I should resolve the doubt in their favor concerning the propriety f striking their names from the roll of attorneys of this court, and fr'ñitld merely leave them to feel the well-deserved punishment that "s inflicted upon them by the Court of Appeals for the' Second fih-.rlt.

fie rule to disbar is, therefore, discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

I heartily approve of the action of the Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in suspending indefinitely the respondents from, practice before that court. The brief which they filed was scandalous and insulting, and richly deserved the punishment that was inflicted; but I have serious doubts whether the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennyslvania, to which they have been admitted to practice, ought to punish them again for this single fault, aggravated though it was. It is quite clear that, while this example of their professional delinquency was aggravated, it falls short of criminal conduct, and I think, therefore, -hnt I should resolve the doubt in their favor concerning the propriety f striking their names from the roll of attorneys of this court, and fr'ñitld merely leave them to feel the well-deserved punishment that "s inflicted upon them by the Court of Appeals for the' Second fih-.rlt.

fie rule to disbar is, therefore, discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 F. 1009, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-watt-dohan-circtedpa-1907.