In the Matter of Burgess
This text of 270 S.E.2d 436 (In the Matter of Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is a disciplinary proceeding in which the complaint alleged that respondent charged and collected excessive fees in two particulars, wrongfully withheld funds owed to the client, improperly split a fee without full disclosure, and improperly contacted the client following the initiation of this grievance proceeding.
The hearing panel found that respondent collected a clearly excessive fee and improperly contacted the complaining witness following the initiation of the grievance. The hearing panel recommended a private reprimand. The Executive Committee found that respondent charged and collected an excessive fee and independently recommended that respondent be publicly reprimanded.
The Court agrees that the acts of respondent justified the recommendation of the Board that he be publicly reprimanded.
Accordingly, the respondent, Harvey William Burgess, stands publicly reprimanded by this Court for his acts of professional misconduct. However, that sanction is conditioned upon satisfactory proof of repayment by respondent of $2,500.00 to the complaining witness, receipt for payment of which respondent shall submit to- the Clerk of this Court within thirty (30) days.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 S.E.2d 436, 275 S.C. 315, 1980 S.C. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-burgess-sc-1980.