In the Matter of Bowkley

949 A.2d 204, 195 N.J. 176, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 607
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 10, 2008
DocketD-115 September Term 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 949 A.2d 204 (In the Matter of Bowkley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Bowkley, 949 A.2d 204, 195 N.J. 176, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 607 (N.J. 2008).

Opinions

ORDER

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed a report with the Court pursuant to Rule 2:15-15(b)in respect of C. WILLIAM BOWKLEY, JR., Judge of the Municipal Courts of the Borough of Hopatcong, the Township of Vernon (Sussex County), the Borough of Chester, and the Township of Jefferson (Morris County), finding by clear and convincing evidence that respondent engaged in conflicts of interest that violated Canon 1 (a judge should personally observe high standards of conduct so the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved), Canon 2A (a judge should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the [177]*177judiciary), and Canon 3C(1) (a judge should disqualify himself from a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and Rule 2:15-8(a)(6) (a judge should not engage in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute);

And the Committee having recommended that because of extenuating circumstances it found to be present in the matter, the formal complaint should be dismissed and respondent privately reprimanded for his misconduct;

And the Court having ordered respondent to show cause why public discipline less than removal from judicial office should not be imposed;

And the Court having considered the arguments of counsel and having determined from its review of the record that the complaint should not be dismissed and that a public admonition is warranted;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that C. WILLIAM BOWKLEY, JR., Judge of the Municipal Court, is hereby admonished for violating Canons 1, 2A, and 3C(1) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and Rule 2:15-8(a)(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Bowkley
949 A.2d 204 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
949 A.2d 204, 195 N.J. 176, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-bowkley-nj-2008.