In the Matter of Bernard G. Winsberg. United States of America, and v. Allen Lyle Heinrich
This text of 446 F.2d 641 (In the Matter of Bernard G. Winsberg. United States of America, and v. Allen Lyle Heinrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY
After a hearing, Bernard G. Wins-berg, counsel for appellant Heinrich, is assessed a penalty of $200 for failure to prosecute the appeal with diligence, particularly with reference to filing his opening brief promptly. This failure occurred notwithstanding District Judge Irving Hill’s order on February 1, 1971 (made while fixing the amount of bail) as follows: “By the way, the setting of bail on appeal is also conditioned on prompt prosecution of the appeal.”
The payment will be made within 14 days after the filing of the within order, the sum to be paid into the Registry of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The assessment is made pursuant to Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
446 F.2d 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-bernard-g-winsberg-united-states-of-america-and-v-ca9-1971.