In the Matter of Bernard G. Winsberg. United States of America, and v. Allen Lyle Heinrich

446 F.2d 641
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 6, 1971·No. 71-1401·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY

PER CURIAM:

After a hearing, Bernard G. Wins-berg, counsel for appellant Heinrich, is assessed a penalty of $200 for failure to prosecute the appeal with diligence, particularly with reference to filing his opening brief promptly. This failure occurred notwithstanding District Judge Irving Hill’s order on February 1, 1971 (made while fixing the amount of bail) as follows: “By the way, the setting of bail on appeal is also conditioned on prompt prosecution of the appeal.”

The payment will be made within 14 days after the filing of the within order, the sum to be paid into the Registry of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The assessment is made pursuant to Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Bernard G. Winsberg. United States of America, and v. Allen Lyle Heinrich, 446 F.2d 641 (9th Cir. 1971).

446 F.2d 641 (In the Matter of Bernard G. Winsberg. United States of America, and v. Allen Lyle Heinrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Samuel A. Bithoney
486 F.2d 319 (First Circuit, 1973)