Cormie v. Security Insurance Company Of Hartford
This text of 446 F.2d 641 (Cormie v. Security Insurance Company Of Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
446 F.2d 641
Nathan A. CORMIE, and his wife Addie B. Cormie,
Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,
v.
SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD,
Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
No. 71-1918 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 19, 1971.
P. A. Bienvenu, New Orleans, La., Timothy J. McNamara, Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donahue, Lafayette, La., Bienvenu & Culver, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant.
Robert E. Morgan, Lake Charles, La., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
446 F.2d 641, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cormie-v-security-insurance-company-of-hartford-ca5-1971.