in the Matter of B.C.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2001
Docket04-00-00858-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of B.C. (in the Matter of B.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of B.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

No. 04-00-00858-CV

IN THE MATTER OF B.C.

Appellant

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2000-JUV-02328

Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Tom Rickhoff, Justice

Paul W. Green, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 19, 2001

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED

Pursuant to a plea agreement, B.C. was sentenced to three years probation for delinquent conduct based on indecency with a child and was remanded to the custody of his parents under the supervision of the Bexar County Juvenile Probation Department. B.C.'s court-appointed attorney on appeal filed a brief in which counsel concludes this appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw.

Counsel's brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Specifically, counsel states B.C. and his guardians were provided with a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and were further informed of B.C.'s right to review the record and file his own brief if he wished. In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 299 (Tex. 1998); In re A.L.H., 974 S.W.2d 359, 360-61 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1998, no pet.). B.C. has not done so.

We reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the motion to withdraw filed by B.C.'s counsel. See Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Bruns v. State
924 S.W.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
In re D.A.S.
973 S.W.2d 296 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
Matter of A.L.H.
974 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of B.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-bc-texapp-2001.