In the Matter of Advance Printing & Litho Co., Bankrupt, Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Warren W. Bentz, Trustee in Bankruptcy

Third Circuit

In the Matter of Advance Printing & Litho Co., Bankrupt, Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Warren W. Bentz, Trustee in Bankruptcy

387 F.2d 952, 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 838

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 30, 1967·No. 16637·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Warren W. Bentz, trustee in bankruptcy, from an order of the district court reversing a decision of the bankruptcy referee.

The district court held that the referee erred in reforming the corporate bankrupt’s contract with Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc., a secured creditor, so that the latter would receive $6,000 less from the receiver’s sale of its collateral than the amount due it under its perfected security agreement. In reversing the referee, the district court also held that Rosenthal was entitled to reasonable compensation for attorney’s services rendered.

We have carefully examined the record and can find no error. We will, therefore, affirm the order of the district court on its well-reasoned opinion. In Matter of Advance Printing & Litho Co., 277 F.Supp. 101 (W.D.Pa., 1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Warren W. Bentz, trustee in bankruptcy, from an order of the district court reversing a decision of the bankruptcy referee.

The district court held that the referee erred in reforming the corporate bankrupt’s contract with Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc., a secured creditor, so that the latter would receive $6,000 less from the receiver’s sale of its collateral than the amount due it under its perfected security agreement. In reversing the referee, the district court also held that Rosenthal was entitled to reasonable compensation for attorney’s services rendered.

We have carefully examined the record and can find no error. We will, therefore, affirm the order of the district court on its well-reasoned opinion. In Matter of Advance Printing & Litho Co., 277 F.Supp. 101 (W.D.Pa., 1967).

In the Matter of Advance Printing & Litho Co., Bankrupt, Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Warren W. Bentz, Trustee in Bankruptcy, 387 F.2d 952, 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 838 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

387 F.2d 952 (In the Matter of Advance Printing & Litho Co., Bankrupt, Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Warren W. Bentz, Trustee in Bankruptcy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related