in the Interest of X.I.M., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 24, 2014·No. 14-14-00344-CV·Published

Opinion

Order filed July 24, 2014

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-14-00344-CV NO. 14-14-00351-CV NO. 14-14-00352-CV NO. 14-14-00368-CV ____________

IN THE INTEREST OF X.I.M., P.M., E.C., D.C., E.C., AND Y.C., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 2002-50811, 2011-10644, 2011-42185, & 2011-01184J

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel certified to this court that he provided appellant with a copy of the Anders brief and the record, and advised appellant of her right to file a pro se brief in response. If appellant desires to file a pro se brief in response to counsel’s Anders brief, appellant’s pro se brief shall be due on or before August 25, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of X.I.M., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in the Interest of X.I.M., a Child (in the Interest of X.I.M., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)