in the Interest of X.I.M., a Child
This text of in the Interest of X.I.M., a Child (in the Interest of X.I.M., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed July 24, 2014
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-14-00344-CV NO. 14-14-00351-CV NO. 14-14-00352-CV NO. 14-14-00368-CV ____________
IN THE INTEREST OF X.I.M., P.M., E.C., D.C., E.C., AND Y.C., CHILDREN
On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 2002-50811, 2011-10644, 2011-42185, & 2011-01184J
ORDER
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel certified to this court that he provided appellant with a copy of the Anders brief and the record, and advised appellant of her right to file a pro se brief in response. If appellant desires to file a pro se brief in response to counsel’s Anders brief, appellant’s pro se brief shall be due on or before August 25, 2014.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of X.I.M., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-xim-a-child-texapp-2014.