In the Interest of T.P.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of T.P.

343 S.W.3d 371, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 943

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 12, 2011·No. No. ED 95518·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Perkins (“Father”) and Susan Perkins (“Mother”) appeal from a judgment terminating their parental rights to their sons, T.P. and B.P. under Section 211.447.5, RSMo. Cum.Supp.2007. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Perkins (“Father”) and Susan Perkins (“Mother”) appeal from a judgment terminating their parental rights to their sons, T.P. and B.P. under Section 211.447.5, RSMo. Cum.Supp.2007. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of T.P., 343 S.W.3d 371, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 943 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

343 S.W.3d 371 (In the Interest of T.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related