In Re Tp

Missouri Court of Appeals

In Re Tp

343 S.W.3d 371, 2011 WL 2893081

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 12, 2011·No. ED 95518·Published

Opinion

343 S.W.3d 371 (2011)

In the INTEREST OF: T.P. & B.P., Juveniles.

No. ED 95518.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 12, 2011.

Carl I. Katzen, Chesterfield, MO, for Appellant.

Mark J. Schwartz, Hillsboro, MO, for Respondent.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and KENNETH THOMPSON, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Perkins ("Father") and Susan Perkins ("Mother") appeal from a judgment terminating their parental rights to their sons, T.P. and B.P. under Section 211.447.5, RSMo. Cum.Supp.2007. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

343 S.W.3d 371 (2011)

In the INTEREST OF: T.P. & B.P., Juveniles.

No. ED 95518.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 12, 2011.

Carl I. Katzen, Chesterfield, MO, for Appellant.

Mark J. Schwartz, Hillsboro, MO, for Respondent.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and KENNETH THOMPSON, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Perkins ("Father") and Susan Perkins ("Mother") appeal from a judgment terminating their parental rights to their sons, T.P. and B.P. under Section 211.447.5, RSMo. Cum.Supp.2007. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

In Re Tp, 343 S.W.3d 371, 2011 WL 2893081 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

343 S.W.3d 371 (In Re Tp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

In the INTEREST OF: T.P. & B.P., Juveniles.

ORDER

Related