in the Interest of R. A. Q.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 31, 2012·No. 03-11-00432-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00432-CV

In the Interest of R. A. Q.

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 09-3302-FC1, HONORABLE TAMARA ARRINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

John Quaak has failed to prosecute his appeal. After requesting and receiving two

extensions of time to file it, appellant’s brief was due March 1, 2012. On May 29, 2012, this Court’s

clerk sent Quaak a notice informing him that his brief was overdue and cautioned that his appeal

could be dismissed for want of prosecution unless Quaak filed a response reasonably explaining his

failure to file a brief. That response was due by June 8, 2012. Quaak has not responded to the

notice, nor has he filed a brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justices Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 31, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of R. A. Q., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in the Interest of R. A. Q. (in the Interest of R. A. Q.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.