in the Interest of R. A. Q.
This text of in the Interest of R. A. Q. (in the Interest of R. A. Q.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00432-CV
In the Interest of R. A. Q.
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 09-3302-FC1, HONORABLE TAMARA ARRINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
John Quaak has failed to prosecute his appeal. After requesting and receiving two
extensions of time to file it, appellant’s brief was due March 1, 2012. On May 29, 2012, this Court’s
clerk sent Quaak a notice informing him that his brief was overdue and cautioned that his appeal
could be dismissed for want of prosecution unless Quaak filed a response reasonably explaining his
failure to file a brief. That response was due by June 8, 2012. Quaak has not responded to the
notice, nor has he filed a brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).
_____________________________________________
J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justices Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: July 31, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of R. A. Q., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-r-a-q-texapp-2012.