in the Interest of R. A. Q.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-10-00495-CV
In the Interest of R. A. Q.
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 09-3302-FC1, HONORABLE GEORGE E. HOLMES, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant John Mark Quaak and appellee the Office of the Attorney General have
both filed motions to dismiss. Quaak contends that the entire cause should be dismissed because the
OAG lacks standing to bring this case. We deny Quaak’s motion. The OAG contends that this
appeal should be dismissed because Quaak on May 23, 2010, timely requested de novo review of the
associate judge’s order, preventing the order from being final and appealable. We grant the OAG’s
motion and dismiss this appeal. The cause may proceed at the trial court level.
J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton
Dismissed on Appellee’s Motion
Filed: December 15, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of R. A. Q. (in the Interest of R. A. Q.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.