In the Interest of M.R.H., Children v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Interest of M.R.H., Children v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of M.R.H., Children v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00595-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M.R.H., et al., Children
From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023-CI-22755 Honorable Lisa Jarrett, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2024
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On October 20, 2023, pro se appellant K.H., the mother of M.R.H., filed a petition to
modify the parent-child relationship. After a year of litigation, K.H. filed a notice of appeal on
September 5, 2024 purporting to appeal a “final judgment/order entered by the trial court on
September 3, 2024.”
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require the notice of appeal to state the date of the
judgment or order appealed from. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d)(2). However, the record contains no
order dated September 3, 2024. Upon further review, appellant appeared to be referring to the trial
court’s September 24, 2024 “Temporary Orders in Suit to Modify Parent-Child Relationship.” This
Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments and those interlocutory orders
specifically authorized by statute. See Bison Bldg. Materials, Ltd. v. Aldridge, 422 S.W.3d 582, 04-24-00595-CV
585 (Tex. 2012); CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447–48 (Tex. 2011); see also TEX CIV.
PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014 (authorizing appeals from certain interlocutory orders). Temporary
orders in a suit to modify parent-child relationship are not subject to interlocutory appeal. See TEX.
FAM. CODE § 105.001(e) (“Temporary orders rendered under this section are not subject to
interlocutory appeal.”); Int. of R.W., No. 02-20-00405-CV, 2021 WL 5132534, at *1 (Tex. App.—
Fort Worth Nov. 4, 2021, no pet.).
We, therefore, ordered appellant to show cause no later than November 25, 2024 why this
appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We admonished appellant if she failed to
satisfactorily respond to this order within the time provided, the appeal would be dismissed. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellant has not filed a response.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of M.R.H., Children v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mrh-children-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.