In the Interest of M.B., P.B., and K.B., Children v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 13, 2025
Docket10-24-00343-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In the Interest of M.B., P.B., and K.B., Children v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of M.B., P.B., and K.B., Children v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of M.B., P.B., and K.B., Children v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-24-00343-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.B., P.B., AND K.B., CHILDREN,

From the 52nd District Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-22-53905

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The father of M.B., P.B., and K.B. appeals the judgment that terminated his

parental rights to his children. After a trial before the associate judge, the trial court

considered the trial de novo and rendered an order which terminated father’s and

mother’s parental rights to the children and found that termination was in the children’s

best interests. See TEX. FAM. CODE § 161.001. The trial court’s order also appointed the

Department as the children’s permanent managing conservator.

On appeal, father challenges, among other things, the trial court’s failure to apply

the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) to the case. See 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-63. The

Department concedes that the ICWA applied to the children after the parents filed for de

novo review and before the trial court terminated the parental rights upon its de novo review. Thus, the Department requests that this Court reverse the judgment of

termination and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a new trial applying the

ICWA. We agree with the Department’s concession and request.

Accordingly, the trial court’s De Novo Order of Termination is reversed, and this

case is remanded to the trial court to conduct a new trial applying the ICWA. See In the

Interest of J.J.C., 302 S.W.3d 896, 903 (Tex. App.—Waco 2009, no pet.). A new trial must

be commenced no later than 180 days after the date the mandate is issued by this Court.

TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(c).

LEE HARRIS Justice

Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Reversed and remanded Opinion delivered and filed February 13, 2025 [CV06]

In the Interest of M.B., P.B., and K.B., Children Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of J.J.C.
302 S.W.3d 896 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Interest of M.B., P.B., and K.B., Children v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mb-pb-and-kb-children-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.