In the Interest of D.S.
16 A.3d 501, 609 Pa. 439, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 784
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of March 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court abuse its discretion when it upheld Petitioner’s adjudication of delinquency for having violated 18 Pa.C.S. § 4914’s ban on lying to police officers about identity, notwithstanding the lack of proof that the plainclothes police officers identified themselves as police and announced that they were conducting an official investigation, based on the conclusion that the proof of either element was unnecessary when the detainee knows he is dealing with the police and that they are conducting an official investigation?
Madame Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Interest of D.S., 16 A.3d 501, 609 Pa. 439, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 784 (Pa. 2011).
16 A.3d 501 (In the Interest of D.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILA.
16 A.3d 501 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)