in the Interest of D.M.O

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 27, 2017·No. 04-17-00290-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 27, 2017

No. 04-17-00290-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.M.O,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016-PA-00385 Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding

ORDER On July 20, 2017, we ordered Appellees Domonique W. and Dwaine W. to inform this Court whether they intended to rely on their pro se brief or whether they intended to have their attorney file one on their behalf. On July 25, 2017, appellees filed an advisory stating that they intend to proceed pro se.

Because appellees have informed this Court that George Carroll does not represent them on appeal and they intend to proceed pro se, George Carroll’s motion for extension of time to file appellees’ brief is DENIED. We ORDER the Clerk of this Court to send all notices to Appellees Dominique W. and Dwaine W. We ORDER George Carroll to file a motion to withdraw within ten days from the date of this order.

This accelerated appeal is now set “at issue.”

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of July, 2017.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada Chief Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of D.M.O, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

in the Interest of D.M.O (in the Interest of D.M.O) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.