in the Interest of D.M.O
This text of in the Interest of D.M.O (in the Interest of D.M.O) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 20, 2017
No. 04-17-00290-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF D.M.O,
From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016-PA-00385 Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding
ORDER On July 18, 2017, Appellees Domonique W. and Dwaine W. filed a pro se appellees’ brief. Also on July 18, 2017, retained counsel George Carroll filed a motion for extension of time, claiming that he intends to file a brief on behalf of appellees. Appellees, however, are not entitled to file a pro se brief and a brief by an attorney on their behalf. Therefore, we ORDER appellees to file a written advisory to this Court within ten days from the date of this order indicating whether they intend to rely on their pro se brief or whether they intend to have their attorney file one on their behalf. If appellees do not timely file such an advisory, this appeal will be set for submission with appellees’ pro se brief, and no brief filed by appellees’ attorney will be considered.
Retained counsel’s motion for extension of time is held in abeyance pending appellees’ response.
_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of July, 2017.
___________________________________ Luz Estrada Chief Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of D.M.O, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-dmo-texapp-2017.