in the Interest of B.S., a Child
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-09-00262-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF B.S., A CHILD
From the County Court at Law Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 76,744
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants challenged the trial court’s oral ruling striking their original petition
to be appointed as permanent managing conservators of the child the subject of the suit
both by mandamus and by direct appeal. This Court granted mandamus relief. See In
re Cervantes, 300 S.W.3d 865 (Tex. App.—Waco 2009, orig. proceeding) (op. on reh’g).
The parties were notified that, unless a response was filed showing grounds for
continuing the appeal, the appeal may be dismissed because: (1) it is moot in light of
this Court’s mandamus ruling; and (2) the trial court’s oral ruling is not an appealable
order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). The Court has received no response. Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed. FELIPE REYNA Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis (Chief Justice Gray concurs in the judgment only, and only to the extent that it dismisses this proceeding. A separate opinion will not issue.) Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed March 3, 2010 [CV06]
In re B.S. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of B.S., a Child (in the Interest of B.S., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.