in the Best Interest and Protection of E.P.
Opinion
Order entered April 7, 2020
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-20-00377-CV
IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF E.P., Appellant
On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MI-20-00463
ORDER
Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion for re-examination of the
process and pivotal documents. Because appellant is represented by counsel and is
not entitled to hybrid representation, we DENY the motion. See Smith v. Smith, 22
S.W.3d 140, 151, 153 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.) (civil
litigant not entitled to hybrid representation); see also In re Black, 04-18-00700-
CV, 2018 WL 6331052, *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 5, 2018, orig.
proceeding) (mem. op.) (same - proceeding for civil commitment of sexually
violent predator).
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Best Interest and Protection of E.P. (in the Best Interest and Protection of E.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.