in the Best Interest and Protection of E.P.
Opinion
Order entered April 6, 2020
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-20-00377-CV
IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF E.P., APPELLANT
On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MI-20-00463
ORDER
Before the Court are appellant’s March 30, 2020 pro se motions to throw out
judgment and for mistrial. Because appellant is represented by counsel and is not
entitled to hybrid representation, we DENY the motion. See Smith v. Smith, 22
S.W.3d 140, 151, 153 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.) (civil
litigant not entitled to hybrid representation); see also In re Black, 04-18-00700-
CV, 2018 WL 6331052 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 15, 2018, orig. proceeding)
(mem. op.) (same - proceeding for civil commitment of sexually violent predator).
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Best Interest and Protection of E.P. (in the Best Interest and Protection of E.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.