In Re Zwillman

293 A.2d 657, 61 N.J. 181, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 172
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 14, 1972·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent was charged with criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. His first jury trial resulted in convictions which he appealed. The Appellate Division reversed and remanded for a new trial. State v. Zwillman, 112 N. J. Super. 6 (1970). His second jury trial also resulted in convictions *182 which he appealed. On May 30, 1972 the Appellate Division affirmed the convictions and on July 10, 1972 we denied certification. 61 N. J. 162 (1972). The nature of the respondent’s misconduct clearly requires that his name he stricken from the roll of attorneys-at-law and it is so ordered. See In re Perwin, 60 N. J. 174 (1972); In re Yormark, 60 N. J. 175 (1972).

Disbarred.

For disbarment — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Mountain. — 7.

Opposed — Done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Zwillman, 293 A.2d 657, 61 N.J. 181, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 172 (N.J. 1972).

293 A.2d 657 (In Re Zwillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Zauber
583 A.2d 1140 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1991)
Matter of Surgent
518 A.2d 215 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1986)
In Re Toplitt
306 A.2d 446 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1973)