In Re Perwin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Perwin

287 A.2d 3, 60 N.J. 174, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 231

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 7, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 287 A.2d 3 (In Re Perwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Perwin, 287 A.2d 3, 60 N.J. 174, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 231 (N.J. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The respondent was convicted of criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. The convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division, State v. Yormark, 117 N. J. Super. 313 (1971), and we have denied certification. 60 N. J. 138 (1972).

The misconduct requires an order of disbarment, and it is so ordered.

At the oral argument respondent stated that he intended promptly to seek further review of the convictions in other tribunals. Should he prevail in those efforts, he may apply to us for reconsideration of this order.

For disbarment—Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Sohettino and Mountain—7.

Opposed—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI