In re Zimmerman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Zimmerman

927 A.2d 390, 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 251, 2007 WL 1437403

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 2007

DocketNo. 06-BG-358

StatusPublished

This text of 927 A.2d 390 (In re Zimmerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Zimmerman, 927 A.2d 390, 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 251, 2007 WL 1437403 (D.C. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The respondent, Seth Zimmerman, a member of our Bar, was convicted on his guilty plea of first-degree theft in violation of D.C.Code §§ 22-3211, 22-3212(a) (2001). As the Board on Professional Responsibility states in its Report and Recommendation, respondent’s offense involves moral turpitude per se, see In re Tillerson, 878 A.2d 1186 (D.C.2005), and his disbarment is therefore mandatory under D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (2001). Neither Bar Counsel nor respondent has disagreed. Accordingly, it is hereby,

ORDERED that Seth Zimmerman is disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, and his name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice before this court. For the purposes of reinstatement, respondent’s disbarment will run from the date that he files an affidavit which conforms to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The respondent, Seth Zimmerman, a member of our Bar, was convicted on his guilty plea of first-degree theft in violation of D.C.Code §§ 22-3211, 22-3212(a) (2001). As the Board on Professional Responsibility states in its Report and Recommendation, respondent’s offense involves moral turpitude per se, see In re Tillerson, 878 A.2d 1186 (D.C.2005), and his disbarment is therefore mandatory under D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (2001). Neither Bar Counsel nor respondent has disagreed. Accordingly, it is hereby,

ORDERED that Seth Zimmerman is disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, and his name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice before this court. For the purposes of reinstatement, respondent’s disbarment will run from the date that he files an affidavit which conforms to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

927 A.2d 390, 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 251, 2007 WL 1437403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zimmerman-dc-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack