In re Zheng Z.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Zheng Z.

68 A.D.3d 886, 889 N.Y.2d 473

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 8, 2009·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[887] The order appealed from expired by its own terms on April 24, 2009. Accordingly, this appeal is academic, and the issue raised is not sufficiently substantial or novel to warrant invoking an exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Anonymous v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 70 NY2d 972, 974 [1988]; Matter of David C., 69 NY2d 796, 798 [1987]; Matter of Geraldine P., 27 AD3d 755, 756 [2006]; Matter of Fernando L., 13 AD3d 450, 451 [2004]; Matter of Kelvin S., 267 AD2d 241 [1999]; Matter of Richard S., 242 AD2d 575, 576 [1997]). Rivera, J.P., Miller, Dickerson and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[887] The order appealed from expired by its own terms on April 24, 2009. Accordingly, this appeal is academic, and the issue raised is not sufficiently substantial or novel to warrant invoking an exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Anonymous v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 70 NY2d 972, 974 [1988]; Matter of David C., 69 NY2d 796, 798 [1987]; Matter of Geraldine P., 27 AD3d 755, 756 [2006]; Matter of Fernando L., 13 AD3d 450, 451 [2004]; Matter of Kelvin S., 267 AD2d 241 [1999]; Matter of Richard S., 242 AD2d 575, 576 [1997]). Rivera, J.P., Miller, Dickerson and Roman, JJ., concur.

In re Zheng Z., 68 A.D.3d 886, 889 N.Y.2d 473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

68 A.D.3d 886 (In re Zheng Z.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related