Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Zheng Z.

In re Zheng Z.

68 A.D.3d 886, 889 N.Y.2d 473
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 886 (In re Zheng Z.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Zheng Z., 68 A.D.3d 886, 889 N.Y.2d 473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

[887]*887The order appealed from expired by its own terms on April 24, 2009. Accordingly, this appeal is academic, and the issue raised is not sufficiently substantial or novel to warrant invoking an exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Anonymous v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 70 NY2d 972, 974 [1988]; Matter of David C., 69 NY2d 796, 798 [1987]; Matter of Geraldine P., 27 AD3d 755, 756 [2006]; Matter of Fernando L., 13 AD3d 450, 451 [2004]; Matter of Kelvin S., 267 AD2d 241 [1999]; Matter of Richard S., 242 AD2d 575, 576 [1997]). Rivera, J.P., Miller, Dickerson and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J., S., STATE OF NEW YORK, v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Subsequent Retention Order Pursuant to CPL 330.20 in Relation to S.J. v. State
111 A.D.3d 1374 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 886, 889 N.Y.2d 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zheng-z-nyappdiv-2009.