In re Kelvin S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kelvin S.

267 A.D.2d 241, 699 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12554

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 241 (In re Kelvin S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kelvin S., 267 A.D.2d 241, 699 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.35 for a rehearing and a review of a retention order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), the petitioner appeals from an order of the same court (DeRosa, J.), dated March 19, 1999, which, upon rehearing and review, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The underlying retention order expired by its own terms, at the latest, on July 29, 1999. Thus, any determination by this Court will not affect the rights of the parties to this proceeding, and the matter does not otherwise warrant invoking an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Richard S., 242 AD2d 575). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.35 for a rehearing and a review of a retention order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), the petitioner appeals from an order of the same court (DeRosa, J.), dated March 19, 1999, which, upon rehearing and review, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The underlying retention order expired by its own terms, at the latest, on July 29, 1999. Thus, any determination by this Court will not affect the rights of the parties to this proceeding, and the matter does not otherwise warrant invoking an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Richard S., 242 AD2d 575). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 241, 699 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kelvin-s-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack