In re Young

195 F. 645, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1667
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedApril 24, 1912
DocketNo. 1,089
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 195 F. 645 (In re Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Young, 195 F. 645, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1667 (W.D. Wash. 1912).

Opinion

HANFORD, District Judge.

[1] This applicant for naturalization has fully complied with all the requirements of the statutes, as an alien petitioner to be admitted as a citizen of the United States; but it is the opinion of the court that he is not eligible for the reason that he is not a white man. By the proof submitted it appears that he was born at a place in Yokohama, Japan, under the dominion of the empire of Germany, and that he is a subject of the emperor [646]*646of Germany. His father is a German, and his mother is a Japanese woman. The naturalization laws enacted by Congress authorize only those aliens to become naturalized citizens of the United States who are white persons or Africans, or of African descent; hence the right to become a naturalized citizen of the United States depends upon parentage and blood, and not upon nationality or status.

[2] The question whether a person half white may be regarded as a white person, within the definition of that term as used in the naturalization laws, was decided, adversely, by Judge Chatfield in the Case of Knight (D. C.) 171 Fed. 299. In principle that case is similar to the case now under consideration, and the question to be decided is identical, and, as I concur in the opinion of Judge Chatfield, I am constrained by the law to deny this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Vasicek
271 F. 326 (E.D. Missouri, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 F. 645, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-young-wawd-1912.