In re Yagman
This text of 322 F. App'x 311 (In re Yagman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Stephen Yagman petitions for a writ of mandamus, requesting this court to direct the district court to order an immediate return to Yagman’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) habeas petition and to discontinue its alleged custom and practice of ordering returns to habeas petitions within twenty days without a finding of good cause, a custom and practice Yagman alleges vio[312]*312lates 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (2006). Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court recently dismissed Yagman’s § 2241 habeas petition. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Yagman’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
322 F. App'x 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-yagman-ca4-2009.