In Re: Woltz

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1211

In Re: HOWELL WAY WOLTZ,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:06-cr-00074-WEB-1)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howell Way Woltz, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Howell Way Woltz petitions for a writ of mandamus

seeking an order removing the district court judge from his case

due to alleged bias. However, Woltz previously sought the same

relief via a petition for a writ of mandamus, which we denied.

See In re Woltz, 325 F. App’x 232, 233 (4th Cir. 2009)

(unpublished). Accordingly, Woltz’s mandamus petition is

denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED